Skip to content Skip to search Skip to footer
Washington University in St. Louis

Brown School

Center for Social Development

Menu
  • About
  • Areas Of Work
    • Our Projects
  • Experts
    • Core Faculty & Staff
    • Faculty Directors
    • Faculty Associates
    • CSD Research Associates & Assistants
  • Publications
  • Partnerships
    • Grand Challenges for Social Work
    • Sister Centers for Social Development
    • Next Age Institute​: Partnership in Social Innovation
    • Washington University Partnerships
    • Funding Partners
  • Newsroom
    • CSD News
    • Media
    • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Join Our Mailing List
Asset Building Financial Inclusion Working Paper

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Tulsa’s IDA Program: Findings From a Long-Term Follow-Up of a Random Assignment Social Experiment

By CSD • September 30, 2013November 4, 2021

This report presents findings from a cost-benefit analysis of the Tulsa Individual Development Account (IDA) program, a demonstration program that was initiated in the late 1990s and is being evaluated through random assignment. The key follow-up data used in the evaluation was collected around 10 years after random assignment, about 6 years after the program ended. The results imply that, during this 10-year observation period, program participants gained from the program and that the program resulted in net costs to the government and private donors, and that society as a whole was probably worse off as a consequence of the program. The report examines in some detail whether these findings are robust to a number of different considerations, including the assumptions upon which the results depend, uncertainly reflected by the standard errors of the impact estimates used to derive the benefits and costs, and omitted benefits and costs, and concludes that they are essentially robust. For example, a Monte Carlo analysis suggests that the probability that the societal net benefits of the Tulsa program were negative during the observation period is over 90% and that the probability that the loss to society exceeded $1,000 is 80%. Further analysis considered benefits and costs that might occur beyond the observation period. Based on this analysis, it appeared plausible, although far from certain, that the societal net benefits of the Tulsa program could eventually become positive. This would occur if the program’s apparent positive net impact on educational attainment generates substantial positive effects on the earnings of program participants after the observation period ended. However, there was no evidence that the educational impacts had yet begun to produce positive effects on earnings by the end of the observation period.

Project: American Dream Policy Demonstration (ADD)

Citation

Greenberg, D. (2012). A cost-benefit analysis of Tulsa’s IDA program: Findings from a long-term follow-up of a random assignment social experiment (CSD Working Paper No. 12-58). St. Louis, MO: Washington University, Center for Social Development.

View Publication
2013American Dream Policy Demonstration (ADD)David GreenbergIndividual Development Account (IDA)matched savings

Center for Social Development

Washington University in St. Louis

MSC 1196-251-46

One Brookings Drive

St. Louis, MO 63130

314-935-7433

csd@wustl.edu

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flickr

Media Contact

Lissa Johnson
CSD Associate Director
ejohnson@wustl.edu

Join our Mailing List

Center for Social Development

©2023 Washington University in St. Louis